Cant pm

It's possible the admin adjusted their profile privacy settings to not allow PMs. In response to your question about expediting your appeal, you can find the answer in our Appeal Tips sticky, found in the appeal section. In particular, you should pay special note to the following point(s):
#15: Bumping your appeal
#16: Time-frame of appeals
#27: I want to talk with a admin / Interview for my appeal

Hidden Content:

**Hidden Content: Content of this hidden block can only be seen by members of (usergroups: Administrative, Moderating).**

Appeal tips say nothing about going back to the front of the queue with a new reply.

We sort by thread creation date, not last reply.

Some appeals are taken out of order if certain conditions are met. No, you cannot forcibly meet those conditions yourself.

Among the circumstances we take a case out of order are:

• hijacking cases (they're given higher priority by policy),
• audited cases after we catch the reporter submitting fake evidence,
• appeals older than 2 years where the appellant is still active,
• those appeals routinely pre-screened for obvious issues before they get added to the backlog.

Your appeal: Dec 9, 2016
Today is: May 14, 2018

​

That's a little under 1.5 years, not "nearly 3".

By policy, staff are not allowed to discuss specific cases in general discussion. This is in the interest of not passing premature judgement (which may preclude staff from working your case), remaining impartial when/if they end up handling your case, and to prevent the general general discussion forum from turning into the request for preferential treatment forum. Reports go in the report section, appeals in the appeal section; not here.

General discussion about policies, procedures, and why we do things the way we do is fine, but if you continue using this forum to expedite your case - before all those other appellants waiting longer than 2 years who didn't try to leverage preferential treatment from the general discussion forum - we will have no choice but to lock your thread.

There isn't one. We try to be fair to everyone, so we have no intention of making one. Hence why I said the rule is intended to prevent general discussion from becoming exactly that.