Perfect, appeal will be addressed when its your turn and if more questions are needed, will ask then, thanks for the followup.
(A) So you had this user added to trade? yes/no? and if so, provide details. (B) Again, can you give an accurate, as best you can, time you had the...
So what specifically is your claim? that it is all fake? Do you have proof to back up your claim?
Since you otherwise say you did know this user,...
First sorry for the long wait, next, the information you provided does not match our own information. Unless these discrepancies are resolved, the...
Per above mention, appeal denied, I am not sure why I did not deny it at the time tho.
You may add me on steam to discuss.
After a review, the appeal is being denied for lack of followup, failure to show repaid and a deny by policy:
Buying/selling/trading/lending or any...
After a review, I am inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt, some of the provided information by you does line up with some of our own...
After a review and giving you well over a month, you were unable to provide proof to support your claim of a hijacking.
Do you have a support ticket to back up your claim of a hijacking?
After a review, the premeditation needed and severity of offense do not warrant consideration of the appeal.
You now have an additional week to fully explain what happened and provide proof of payment.
An additional week to followup.
An additional two weeks to followup.
An additional week to provide what I already asked for, you provided zero proof so far to back up your claim of a hijacking.
Denied for lack of followup and failure to substantiate a claim of hijacking.
After a review of the report and this appeal, the bot impersonation happened after the original offense and would have been after your "last attempt"...
This is answered already:
Separate names with a comma.