Archived Appeal: 76561198031566289 - (fr0g.si / BANNED BY SR)

Appeal for BANNED BY SR

Steam profile: 76561198031566289 (fr0g.si)

Appeal Plea: I committed the offense(s), I admit it
Appeal Reason: [Change of Heart] I will never scam again.

Victim Repayment: Yes, I repaid the victims of my offense(s)
Previous Appeals: Yes, I appealed here before and it was denied.​

Alternate Accounts:

​

Appeal description:

So after I got tagged for scammer I contacted and repaid victim within few hours I also made an appeal on the ban but it was denied because I didn't upload the chat logs with a victim. I didn't know they are required also after i wrote i am unable to provide screenshots due to closing the chat before admin told me that they are obligatory in the process. But after he wrote that i have to provide context in which repayment was made. So I did, I wrote everything I remember I gave victim to read the context and he confirmed as well. Now I really don't know what to do.

Here is the ban thread: https://forums.steamrep.com/threads...tf2-team-fortress-2-items.156648/#post-418026

Here is the appeal thread: https://forums.steamrep.com/threads...6289-fr0g-si-banned-by-sr.156683/#post-418547

I would greatly appreciate if another admin could review this.

I never want to go down the same road​

You can screenshot on mobile, that's how I did it. Just as long as you have not deleted the chat.

I did, but i repaid around 12 pm, admin requested chat logs hours later, and I talked a lot with the victim later, so the chat history didn't go as far back, I provided mobile history aswell

I want my appeal to be reviewed by another admin because previous admin rejected my appeal due to lack of context in which item was repaid when he requested it. it's clearly that I provided context but it was written down as close and as honest as I remember there was nothing made up. I don't want to lie to anyone it is not good for any of us especially for me, victim confirmed the that aswell. In addition, why would I repay item in first place, If I wanted to stay scammer I wouldn't make a single ticket here I would just run with the item, I truly regret my misdeed of scamming, this will never ever happen again. And victim was repaid in less than 2 days, all monetary loss was repaid. Alternatively, I suggest (if its possible) to interview the victim. I never imagined to be in situation like this trading is my passion and it was taken away, I truly wish i could go back in time and erase that day from my life -.-

It's number 3 sir

I consider this is as extenuating circumstances because:
Firstly, the victim was not paying attention while he accepted the trade therefore it's not entirely my fault, but what was a bit unfair in my scam report that admin didn't consider my evidence, when I sent him an offer with these items: 75 keys + my unusual western wear + my knife for his unusual rocket launcher and his unusual hat with a description

and he declined the offer. After he declined I sent him another offer with 75 keys + australium minigun + my unusual for his unusual rocket launcher and unusual hat, and he accepted! Immediately after the traded he texted why did I steal his rocket launcher, but at the time I HIGHLY doubt that I thought he is making an excuse to trade back. Meanwhile I was playing mvm, so I told him I am going to play a bit with his rocket launcher and return it after I finish the tour, it was around 12 am on the Friday so I played 3 out of 4 maps of the tour that night I played until 3 am,than I went to sleep, next day I was not home whole day and meanwhile I was away he reported me because he probably thought I will keep the item. On Sunday 5th of march I returned him his rocket launcher after I played last tour of mvm and we both played mvm together and after tour he immediately received the rocket launcher. But this is more leaning towards reason number 1 and 2.

Secondly, the real reason why i consider this as an extenuating circumstances is because, admin replied a bit late after I uploaded the proof of repayment but without chat so he wrote

and after i saw this I had no clue what does that mean so I browsed the forum a bit and I saw that he wrote that a lot on appeals and than i realized why, because they did not upload chats. To be honest i started to sweat a bit... Because guess what, I closed the chat hours before that, I asked victim if he has longs, he closed aswell, I checked my chat history in mobile phone too, It did not reach so far back because we chatted through out the day a lot with a victim. So than admin showed me the rules where it says that I must upload chat when I repay victim. I admit I didn't read that thread because I missed it somewhere, I read everything on that post https://forums.steamrep.com/threads/howto-appeal-banned-and-caution-reputation-tags.58/ and after i wrote my appeal with me thinking i am well prepared and that I know everything, and as it shows I made a major mistake and i blame my sloppy reading for that. English is not my mother language either, and I am not familiar with academic usage, well I have some knowledge, but I am just stepping into the academic world. Please bear with me, and I know my texts are super unpleasant to read because i am terrible at explaining stuff.

IF there is anything more I could do, please let me know

Second part of my post talks about it i believe, and I can add that I provided context which admin requested and appeal still got denied.

Can I get examples of an extenuating circumstance, otherwise whole thing I wrote is more suitable to number 2? I can imagine what extenuating circumstance is but not in this environment so I would like to know.

Ok, I failed to provide context according to the admin, but I had written it down. But his response was appeal being denied. So I want to suggest if there is an option to interview the victim with SR admin. So that admin can be provided with a context, because there is clearly no other way I can obtain the chat.

I want some evidence to be reviewed and i want other admin to interview the victim so title Missing evidence or not enough would be more appropriate

Ok, my extenuating circumstance is basicly the fact that I do not scam people I do not have any history since i started, I do not cause problems, and I want to stay legit as it was before that day -.-