Invalid Appeal: 76561198058662819 - (Jellyfish on VACation 4ever / BANNED BY SR)

Appeal for BANNED BY SR

Steam profile: 76561198058662819 (Jellyfish on VACation 4ever)

Appeal Plea: I am innocent of all listed offenses
Appeal Reason: [Evidence] Missing - Evidence is missing or not enough

Victim Repayment: No, I committed no fraud or had no direct victims
Previous Appeals: Yes, I appealed here earlier for another situation in the past.​

Alternate Accounts:

| steamname: ϟ White Wolf ϟ
| steamID32: STEAM_0:1:47008863
| steamID64: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198054283455
| customURL: http://steamcommunity.com/id/Wizardbank
| steamrep: http://steamrep.com/profiles/76561198054283455

Storage account.​

Appeal description:

This is an appeal to the recent report that was made against me and that gave me a Scammer mark which i retain to be unfairly given after looking at what the victim offered as evidence.
"I believe I was wrongly accused and punished for an offense I did not commit"

Point one- View attachment 427913
The agreement we had was only for the first pot as stated by the Victim himself:
"anyways so the deal is, we are just entering the pot on sweetstakes..."
It is clear he used the word "pot" not "pots", so the agreement does not consequently apply to any other pots done that night.

Point two- View attachment 427915
The TOS of Sweetstakes show that when you deposit on a jackpot/pot, it is not guaranteed that you will receive the items you put in back.

Point three- View attachment 427934 View attachment 427935
The Help page of Sweetstakes shows a difference between "jackpot/pot" and "jackpots/pots", since we played our jackpots on the site, A.
must therefore be aware that there is a difference between "pot" and "pots".
And as the screenshots show him asking about an agreement and me not agreeing, it should be taken as no deal was made between me and him as who would be the owner of the items after the jackpot ended.
Here the Sweetstakes TOS would take place and make the winner be the rightful owner of the items, since no deal was made about giving back.

point four- No timestamps from our Chat were provided on the report that was made yesterday which may have lead to confusion as myself had a bit of confusion on which part went where.
Timestamps are crucial in proving something, and the time in between each pot was very big, gambling wise, 40 jackpots passed and in 40 jackpots a lot can happen.
View attachment 427936 View attachment 427937

point five- He asked other users with more important places in the TF2 community to ask for his items and ended up with a threat even if the user that threatened me believe it was not.
View attachment 427938 View attachment 427939
The user in question is:
| steamname: ༺ buddhapest ༻
| steamID32: STEAM_0:0:136841
| steamID64: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197960539410
| customURL: http://steamcommunity.com/id/buddhapest
| steamrep: http://steamrep.com/profiles/76561197960539410

Which coming from a Bazaar.tf Admin is a big offense to do and give inappropriately without having read through the chat logs and only assuming having heard only 1 side of the story.

In conclusion, the evidence provided by my accuser is insufficient to prove any wrongdoing by me and was used as a means to protect his interests after gambling and losing fairly.​