1. There is no such thing as a "pending" ban or Steam admin. Anyone threatening your account is a scammer trying to scare you. Read more.

Rejected Appeal: 76561198142191026 - (metszo / BANNED BY SR)

Discussion in 'Archived Appeals' started by ✪ metszo, Jan 16, 2018.

  1. ✪ metszo

    ✪ metszo Banned on SteamRep

    Messages:
    3
    Steam:
    STEAM_0:0:90962649
    Appeal for BANNED BY SR

    Steam profile: 76561198142191026 (metszo)

    Appeal Plea: I am innocent of all listed offenses
    Appeal Reason: [Accounts] Hijacked - My account was abused by hijacker
    Victim Repayment: No, I committed no fraud or had no direct victims
    Previous Appeals: No, this is my first appeal here

    Alternate Accounts:


    Appeal description:
    Hello,
    My account steam was hacked. Today I restored it, but found out the reputation on SteamRep was spoiled. The one who hacked me turned out to be a scammer.
    Topic with a report (scammer ✪ DREADlock)
    https://forums.steamrep.com/threads/report-76561198142191026-dota2-dota2-items.129109/

    All Evidence of hacking is available. I have correspondence with Steam support, what confirms that the account was hacked. I want to provide evidence of the administration in person in any form.​
  2. ✪ metszo

    ✪ metszo Banned on SteamRep

    Messages:
    3
    Steam:
    STEAM_0:0:90962649
  3. ✪ metszo

    ✪ metszo Banned on SteamRep

    Messages:
    3
    Steam:
    STEAM_0:0:90962649
    Proofs

    Attached Files:

  4. You Are The One

    You Are The One SteamRep Admin

    Messages:
    144
    Steam:
    STEAM_0:1:41038663
    You must submit screenshots from a desktop browser. You must submit the date you were hijacked and the date you recovered your account as well. Two weeks to followup.

    Hidden Content:
    **Hidden Content: Content of this hidden block can only be seen by members of (usergroups: Administrative).**
  5. You Are The One

    You Are The One SteamRep Admin

    Messages:
    144
    Steam:
    STEAM_0:1:41038663
    After a review, their is insufficient evidence provided by you to show you were actually hijacked during the time of the offense and additional evidence that indicates the account was not hijacked/in control by the same user.

    Appeal denied.