Archived 76561198041184271 (Princess Ivory Jubilee~)

Look. Stop running from this. You and I both know I told you not to go as far as banning her.
I'm just clinging to an inane notion? Seems like I'm not the only one here. You come to my ban appeal, post completely irrellevant information and expect some sort of justice system to all work out.

I'm going to be frank here. Getting somebody else to argue for you in your ban request deems some shadiness in my books.
What's more is you see me as some unfeeling a✿✿✿✿✿✿ who's doing this for pleasure, which I honestly saw coming.
Refer to her ban on outpost. http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/12290 She lied and used people for hats, the main victims being me and sparkwire. It would honestly be extremely hard to even PRETEND that I don't feel contempt to her because I do! And I'm not going to deny that.

Just a quick tip buddy, your opinions will get more easily believed if you don't insult anyone in the process, as it shows bias.

Finally, here's me stating my intentions regarding the falsification of evidence. It's from the skial thread: http://www.skial.com/threads/attn-ivory-jubilee.24946/page-11 which has long since been locked, meaning I posted this before Schrodinger's Hat posted.



Please, check my skial profile and check the steam account linked. http://www.skial.com/members/smokey.3789/

I do believe we're done here, regarding this subject.

I'm done posting in this current thread. I would rather play GW2. Oh, and don't lecture me on bias when this entire thread is based on your own. Secondly, of coarse I'm biased. I'm Ivory's friend, and even though I came into the discussion a neutral party, you lied to my face, and tole me that whatever she tried to tell me was a lie, denying her actions. Of coarse I leaned to her side after this. I biased against you, and I never denied that fact. Anyways, guild wars two. I have a mesmer to play

And she asked me to do nothing. I argued for her on my own free will. I came into the situation curious, though that quickly changed to more of a 'determined to not allow a misguided liar unjustly punish her'. I have gotten no pleasure from this, quite the opposite. I've acquired a fair bit of frustration, as well as a lack of sleep/gw2 playing time. I'm doing this because what you're doing is wrong, and I won't stand for it.

I'm sorry you got caught up in this. It wasn't worth your time, or my time. Let's hope the ban is clear from here on out.

Then how did you find the skial thread? Never mind. It's understandable that you'd defend yourself, and I'm not going to attack you for it. I want this over and done with.

there is a possibility both parties end up getting tagged... Trying to falsify scammer evidence tends to result in a scammer tag, lol.

She seemed down. I asked her what was wrong. She linked me the thread. I read through it, then decided to post. We've been through this before, if you recall. Plus, why would I defend myself? I'm not the party up for question here. That would be you and Ivory. Don't try to put eyes on me when there's nothing for the moderators to look at.

Well that's just brilliant. Turns out I'm too soft!

Of course, there's nothing being judged on you besides your posts here. And no, you defended Ivory in a few of you posts in this thread, then yourself. Please, there's no point to reply to this.

Wait, I'm confused. You reported her over 8 keys. but if she gave you a free bud wouldn't that cover 8 keys and more?

Though, there's reason to reply to this. You're not soft, you're childish to think you could let a lie fall through on a steamrep thread.

Actually the date I recieved the bud was before I gave her the 8 keys.

Please, insulting people in a SR thread is not going to help anyone. A lie? Please inform me on this lie.

Not exactally. She asked him to convince his friend to give something back that she had sold to his friend, and he required a 1 earbuds payment, which is even worse if you ask me. My question is, why is the teapot calling the kettle a sleezbag?

That you paid her for... earbuds?... I thought we went over this and posted evidence against this all day yesterday :v

Finally, this is last piece of evidence to show Schrodinger's failure to tell Ivory that I did this for her.

Still there's absolutely NO relevance to the initial ban request. So make a seperate thread and report me for it, if you think it's still applicable.

As I said in the chat. I am not your messenger boy. If you have something to tell her, that's your business, not mine, but I will not try to convince her of something I don't even believe is true. If she doesn't believe you, so be it, that's her business, but what does it matter that I refused to convey a message I believe is false?